YouTube Vs SouthFront
The comedy show named ‘YouTube and its attempts to justify the need to censor SouthFront’ just got a new episode.
On July 28, YouTube blocked SouthFront’s backup channel created in May to upload videos, while the main one remains terminated due to YouTube’s inability to tolerate independent points of view. The blocked channel had ZERO YouTube strikes.
The move is an apparent part of the ongoing censorship campaign against SouthFront.
The July 28 situation is the second time when YouTube blocked SouthFront’s backup channel. The previous censorship attempt happened on May 16.
Then, SouthFront appealed the decision and by May 18, YouTube restored SouthFront’s backup channel. The decision of YouTube Team to restore the channel clearly demonstrated that SouthFront content does not violate any YouTube Community Guidlines or Terms of Service.
At that moment, the backup channel had about 1,3900 subscribers. As of July 28, the number of subscribers overcame 7,000.
Therefore, this approach of YouTube confirms that this is clearly a politically-motivated decision aimed at suppressing SouthFront on the platform.
IN PREVIOUS SERIES
The text below was released by SouthFront on June 24, 2020 (source):
More than 1.5 months since the censorship of SouthFront’s main channel on YouTube, the YouTube staff has been ignoring SouthFront rejecting requests to provide at least some kind of formal reason behind this decision. However, in mid-June, YouTube finally invented some formal explanation for its illegal decision to censor SouthFront.
Now, YouTube claims that SouthFront’s main channel was terminated because of “repeated or severe violations” of YouTube Community Guidelines, including “spam, scams or commercially deceptive content”. The claim that SouthFront content on YouTube somehow promoted spam, scams or deceptive content is a blatant lie.
HINT: On May 1, YouTube terminated all of South Front’s channels, with approximately 170,000 subscribers. The main YouTube channel in English had over 152,000 subscribers, 1,900 uploaded videos and approximately 60 million views. The termination of our channels occurred without any warnings or notifications and regardless of the fact that our YouTube channels had zero active strikes.
We immediately appealed this decision and during the next weeks repeatedly requested YouTube to explain reasons behind it. However, no real answers have been provided until now.
A summary of the recent events:
On June 16, YouTube requested us to provide him links to SouthFront channels, which were terminated (like YouTube Support Team cannot get these links by itself):
SouthFront provided all the requested information:
On June 18, YouTube finally invented a formal explantion for its unjustified decision to censor SouthFront by claiming that our main YouTube channel with over 152,000 subscribers was promoting “spam, scams or commercially deceptive content”:
However, this claim goes contrary to YouTube’s official data itself. There was zero YouTube Community Guidelines strikes or any other strikes on the channel.
On May 3, YouTube Support Team officially confirmed this fact in its own email saying that there were “no reasons” to terminate SouthFront’s channel:
We emphasized this in our answer to YouTube’s new claims:
On June 22, YouTube made a one more clumsy attempt to explain its decision to censor SouthFront. This time YouTube Support Team claimed that “multiple Community Guideline strikes” may have become the reason behind the termination of our channel.
Indeed, few years ago, SouthFront’s YouTube channel received Community Guidelines strikes because of a mass flagging of our videos by ill-wishers. These Community Guidelines strikes were removed after our appeals to YouTube Support Team. Therefore, YouTube officially confirmed that these strikes were unjustified or added by mistake. Therefore, SouthFront’s YouTube channel had ZERO strikes when it was terminated.
On June 23, YouTube sent us a new reply very similar to those that we received previously on June 11. This reply does not deal with the current situation in a direct way. In fact, YouTube cannot confirm its claims about supposed Community Guidelines violations because it has no evidence to do so. Therefore, it just used SouthFront’s readiness to defend its rights as a formal pretext to not provide any facts and evidence behind its decision to terminate SouthFront’s channel.
This situation once again demonstrates the double-faced approach of the service that tries to hide blatant acts of censorship behind baseless claims about supposed Community Guidelines violations.
We eagerly await the further development of this situation. How would YouTube try to explain this act of illegal censorship next time?
YOUR SUPPORT IS CRITICAL TO KEEP SOUTHFRONT ALIVE:
Donate via VISA, PayPal, Paysafecard, Bitcoin and other options.
This systems accepts all types of cards, PayPal, Amazon Payments, bitcoin (FAQ is under the main text, in P.S.)
You can subscribe for a monthly donation of $15 (or any another amount) OR make one time donation by clicking buttons below
SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence Team